Journalism 101
No story is worth your life
With the Libyan crisis and the Japan’s devastating earthquake now making headlines in newspapers and TV broadcasts, I can’t help appreciating the efforts of these journalists—men and women in various media--, who have been putting their lives on the line covering these dangerous events.
I sympathise with these courageous men and women because I myself have experienced covering back home -- the EDSA revolutions, violent military coups, the Muslim rebellion in Mindanao and the Communist insurgency—and I know being a journalist is not an easy calling and getting killed is just one of the hazards that goes with the job.
Journalism is not just a job or a calling. It’s a mission; a way of life, Journalists will always be covering important and life-changing situations risking their lives all in the name of their quest for truth.
Nowadays, journalists are now easy targets not only in Libya but also in other media hotspots. Gone are the days when journalists and other media practitioners used to enjoy some form of unwritten immunity since they have been recognized to be independent observers whose job is mainly to report the news freely. But the scene of this world is constantly changing; we are now living in a violent world where nobody feels safe anymore, not even journalists covering their beats. In some cases, combatants in conflict situations have gotten rid of the rules of engagement, so with this “ free-for-all” atmosphere in conflict zones, a number of journalists have become casualties.
The vulnerability of these media people is even more pronounced when we consider that some of them are doing their job out there on the battle ground getting all the facts, interviewing people, zooming TV cameras to catch live actions as the story unfolds, thereby bringing the newscasts right to the comfort of our homes
I’ve seen on the ABS-CBN’s TV Patrol World a handful of Filipino reporters covering the evacuation of our kababayans in Japan to escape the possible meltdown of the nuclear reactors damaged by the recent earthquake.
Well, unlike covering violent conflicts, reporting on the possible nuclear reactors’ meltdown is one of the hardest assignments journalists could ever have considering that the main enemy is an invisible one: radiation. Are they well equipped to deal with radiation fallout? Should the reactors explode, could they easily get out; would they have enough time to escape? These are some of the questions that have crossed my mind because more than “tapang” is needed by my colleagues to escape unscathed covering this perilous assignment.
While writing this piece, I’ve read a Yahoo news that says “ Journalists Monday are breathing sigh of relief as news comes that four of their peers—two reporters and two photographers from the New York Times—have been released after being swept up by authorities last week while covering the turmoil in Libya. But the fates of several other correspondents assigned to the war zone remain unclear.”
The same report says that the Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) has confirmed reports that 13 journalists have been missing or detained in Libya.
On reading this news item, it reminds me of what Terry Anderson, CPJ honorary vice-chairman and former AP Beirut bureau chief, who was held hostage for nearly seven years in Lebanon, has said “Always, constantly, constantly, every minute weigh the benefits against the risks. And as soon as you come to the point where you feel uncomfortable with the equation, get out, go, and leave it. It’s not worth it. There is no story worth getting killed for”.
Yes, it’s true that there is no story worth dying for—but still there will be journalists who would be willing to risk their lives to report on some life-changing situations that matter to us.
These journalists have fears just like you and I but they are of different breed of people.
You are the modern-day heroes--may your tribe increase!